Hi guys, JiBX *does* support working with XMLStreamReader/Writer. It looks like the online documentation is still back at version 1.0 so I can't link directly (I'll fix that for the upcoming release), but if you look in the distribution docs you'll see org.jibx.runtime.impl.StAXReaderFactory and StAXReaderWrapper used for unmarshalling, and StAXWriter used for marshalling. These are implementations of the common IXMLReader/Writer interface used by JiBX.
There are also org.jibx.extras.DomElementMapper/DomFragmentMapper/DomListMapper classes in the extras section. These are used for converting portions of a document to and from DOM, but could be the basis for doing IXMLReader/Writer implementations if you preferred to go the DOM route. Thanks for the pointer to the comparison article. I've got my own performance comparison coming out within the next month, but hadn't seen that one. Cheers, - Dennis Dennis M. Sosnoski SOA and Web Services in Java Training and Consulting http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 Raymond Feng wrote: > It will be nice to have JiBX databinding in Tuscany. I took a quick > look on JiBX and it should be fairly simple to support JiBX. > > On the surface, it seems that JiBX marshaling/unmarshaling only > exposes InputStream/OutputStream/Reader/Writer. From the data > transformation perspective, we would prefer to see the support to > marshal/unmarshal JiBX object to/from intermediate formats such as > XMLStreamReader or DOM Node. This way, we could convert an AXIOM into > JiBX object following the path: OMElement --> XMLStreamReader --> JiBX > without using the heavy IO stream. > > I will be glad to help from Tuscany side. You can find more > information about Tuscany databinding at > http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/tuscany-databinding-guide.html. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:45 AM > Subject: Re: Neat Article on Comparison of Web Service Stacks.... > > >> Which reminds me, I've always thought we should make a JiBX >> databinding for >> Tuscany. It might not be so hard to take one of the existing >> databindings to >> use as a base for a new JiBX one. Maybe Dennis would even help if we >> show >> some interest... >> >> ...ant >> >> On 10/16/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> Worth checking this out: >>> >>> http://opensource.sys-con.com/read/439687.htm >>> >>> ...discusses Axis2 and XFire and their relative performance... >>> >>> >>> Yours, Mike. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
