Hi Patrick In lieu of Kelvin responding to this (I was going to help Kelvin out and make the slides) I think it would be really good to have you be part of the presentation. It brings a slightly different perspective and broadens the appeal I think.
Regards Simon On 10/16/07, Patrick Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Haleh, the abstract looks good. > > Kelvin, I would be happy to join you if you want to do the > multi-presenter. > > ________________________________ > > From: haleh mahbod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ApacheCon Europe 2008 > > > How about the following. The talk is in April and by then there might be > other releases beyond release 1.0 which is emphasized in the original > text. > > An update on Apache Tuscany project- Building SOA solutions is easy > > Apache Tuscany provides an open-source services infrastructure for > constructing SOA solutions from heterogeneous and distributed > services. This talk will focus on Apache Tuscany's implementation of > Service Component Architecture which is based on V1.0 specification that > is now > under OASIS for standardization. In addition, the talk will cover Apache > Tuscany > added extensions such as web 2.0, scripting, distribution and > multi-language support as well as integration with other Apache projects > such as ODE and Geronimo. > Some of the interesting topics that are under discussion in Apache > Tuscany will be highlighted. > > The talk will be complemented with a demo to demonstrate how easy it is > to use Apache Tuscany to develop SOA solutions. > > > > > On 10/11/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/9/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ApacheCon Europe is coming up, 7th to 11th of April 2008 [1], > and the > > deadline for submission of abstracts is coming up fast, on > 26th of > > this month. > > > > What should we aim to do here? > > > > The options seem to be > > > > (60 minutes) Multi-person panel discussion > > (60 minutes) Normal presentation > > Intensive topical training (full-day) > > Intensive topical training (half-day) > > Intensive topical training (two-day) > > > > My guess is that we should submit for a 60 minute > presentation, but > > should we go for a tutorial session as well? > > > > I'm happy to coordinate, and although presenting on SCA would > take me > > a little out of my comfort zone, I would welcome the chance to > do so. > > > > As a possible starting point for thinking about this I was > looking at > > Simon Laws' abstract and presentation for the recent JavaZone > > conference [2], [3]. What would we want to update or > emphasize > > differently from this? In the short term we just need to get > an > > abstract together and think about who will do the > presentation. > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > [1] http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > > [2] http://www4.java.no/web/show.do?page=92&articleid=5343 > > [3] > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/68184/BuildingSO > AWithApacheTuscany.ppt?version=1 > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I would certainly submit an abstract for a 60 minute > presentation. I know > others in the community have been working on tutorial material. > What's the > state of that? If that is going ahead then that material could > be reused and > a proposal made. Would be good to get more mileage out of it. > > Regards > > Simon > > > >
