Hi,
I checked in some code as the seed to jump start the transaction policy
support in Tuscany. Please see more details at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586640&view=rev.
By looking into the code we have today, I have a few questions.
1)
org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.embedded.impl.ReallySmallRuntime.loadDomainDefinitions(SCADefinitionsDocumentProcessor)
assuming we have only one "definitions.xml"?
2) Should the binding/implementation type contribute policy interceptors
instead of wrapping the invoker?
3) META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.PolicySetHandlers
The syntax <qname>=<class> is not consistent with the other extension
points. I propose that we use: <class>;qname=<qname>, for example,
org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.transaction.TransactionPolicyHandler;qname={http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/1.0}TransactionPolicy
I'll post more questions as we evolve.
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
