I'm trapped by the groovy pom changes. :-( Anyway, I switch to groovy-all-minimal now.

Thanks,
Raymond

----- Original Message ----- From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating


On 10/31/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Raymond,

I did set out to fix the build.xml, but it seems like Luciano has gone
ahead
with it already.

- Venkat

On 10/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Simon/Venkat.
>
> Please fix the build.xml. You can use the maven-ant-generator to
generate
> one and test it.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 9:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating
>
>
> > On 10/31/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> With the webapps, it seems to be the build.xml problem.  For the
> >> distributed-calculator there are exceptions that are thrown when I
> start
> >> the
> >> other nodes after the domainNode.
> >>
> >> I have checked out the branch afresh and have build a bin dist.  I
> still
> >> see
> >> the stax jars missing from the lib.  Is anybody else seeing this
?  Any
> >> clues to why this could be happening ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> - Venkat
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Did you run into all these problems with build.xml? I found it > >> > very
> >> > difficult to manually maintain them. Now we have a maven plugin to
> >> > generate
> >> > them, but it seems to be too late to use them in 1.0.1.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Raymond
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > To: <[email protected]>
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:11 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On 10/30/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Hi,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release > >> > >> artifacts
> of
> >> > >> Tuscany SCA for Java.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> SVN Tag:
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0.1-RC2/
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Stage maven repo: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/maven/
> >> > >>
> >> > >> RAT report:
> >> > >>
> http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/1.0.1-RC2/1.0.1-RC2.rat.txt
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) :
> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/1.0.1-RC2/
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks,
> >> > >> Raymond
> >> > >>
> >> > >> FYI:
> >> > >> To build the source distro from the stage maven repo, you can
add
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> <profiles> element below to your maven settings.xml and run
> >> > >> "mvn -Pstaging
> >> > >> clean install".
> >> > >>
> >> > >> <settings>
> >> > >>     ...
> >> > >>     <profiles>
> >> > >>         <profile>
> >> > >>             <id>staging</id>
> >> > >>             <activation>
> >> > >>                 <activeByDefault>false</activeByDefault>
> >> > >>             </activation>
> >> > >>             <repositories>
> >> > >>                 <repository>
> >> > >>                     <id>tuscany.staging</id>
> >> > >>                     <url>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/maven
> >> > >> </url>
> >> > >>                 </repository>
> >> > >>             </repositories>
> >> > >>             <pluginRepositories>
> >> > >>                 <pluginRepository>
> >> > >>                     <id>tuscany.staging</id>
> >> > >>                     <url>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/maven
> >> > >> </url>
> >> > >>                 </pluginRepository>
> >> > >>             </pluginRepositories>
> >> > >>         </profile>
> >> > >>     </profiles>
> >> > >>     ...
> >> > >> </settings>
> >> > >>
> >> > > Hi Raymond
> >> > >
> >> > > Have started trying the binary distro in RC2 and I'm having a > >> > > few
> >> > > problems,
> >> > > for example, the sample web apps don't work for me,
> >> > calculator-distributed
> >> > > doesn't work the big bank demo doesn't work. Some of the things
> (the
> >> web
> >> > > app
> >> > > problem) were mentioned with the previous RC so I'm just
wondering
> if
> >> > the
> >> > > right jars have been posted.
> >> > >
> >> > > I want to do something else until later today but I'll go ahead
and
> >> > check
> >> > > out the 1.0.1 branch and start fixing things but I just wanted > >> > > to
> >> check
> >> > > with
> >> > > you to avoid debugging problems that have already been > >> > > addressed.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > >
> >> > > Simon
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> > Yep. I think the webapp probs are down the the build.xml scripts. > > I'll
> fix
> > them if you want me to.
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


There's still a lot of jar's included that were'nt in 1.0 and a lot of them
look like they should be excluded:
ant-1.6.5.jar
ant-junit-1.6.5.jar
ant-launcher-1.6.5.jar
axis2-adb-codegen-1.3.jar
bsf-2.4.0.jar
cglib-full-2.0.jar
commons-cli-1.0.jar
commons-discovery-0.2.jar
jarjar-0.6.jar
jettison-1.0-RC2.jar
jmock-1.1.0.jar
jmock-cglib-1.1.0.jar
jsp-api-2.0.jar
mockobjects-core-0.09.jar
mx4j-3.0.1.jar
nekohtml-0.9.5.jar
qdox-1.5.jar
radeox-0.9.jar
radeox-oro-0.9.jar
xbean-2.1.0.jar
xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar
xpp3_min-1.1.3.4.O.jar
xstream-1.2.jar

Think we need to go through them one by finding where they're coming from
and exclude them at the source.

  ...ant



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to