On Nov 14, 2007 7:56 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have started reviewing and adding implementation.jpa [1] to Tuscany > SVN. I was wondering how would that relate to the other efforts being > done related to data access, and if we should align this to the same > direction. Maybe we could have something like : > > - implementation-data-xml > - implementation-data-sdo > - implementation-data-pojo / jpa > > Thoughts ? > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1903 > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Luciano
On the face of it it sounds like a good idea. Is there some abstraction at the implementation-data level. I expect (but don't know) that these implementation types will all be providing access to data in various forms. The current implementation-data provides a CRUD style interface. Implementation.openjpa seems to favour persist, find, createQuery etc. What will xml and sdo be providing? Simon
