On Nov 19, 2007 2:49 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 17, 2007 5:49 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > <snip> > > I was only considering the first composite as I still think that a node > > should only run a single composite :) > > > > > Ok, any helpful suggestions on the discussion in [1] relating to problems > starting a domain and multiple nodes in the same webapp/Tomcat/Geronimo > instance? > > ...ant > > [1] > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > Ant
I've been thinking about this a little so I'll reply on the original thread. On the subject of this thread... I understand what you are trying to do now. Thanks for the explanation. I still think it feels a little odd that is takes a port number from one of the bindings. If you haven't specified a uri in a binding then I guess you don't care what port number you get. So choosing a port number from a binding doesn't do any harm and is slightly more efficient in terms of port resources then using the default port number that the node invents when no node url is provided. Just justifying it to myself ;-) Simon
