[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
The javadoc in QName.valueOf(String) method has some explanations:

http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/javax/xml/namespace/QName.html#valueOf(java.lang.String)

Thanks,
Raymond


OK Thanks, what about the other questions?


Also, I'm not sure I understand the code issue. Can't the call to
String.indexOf('#') just be changed to String.lastIndexOf('#')?

--

Sorry, there was one more question :)

I don't have strong objections to change from ns#name to {ns}name but I'm just not sure what's justifying it given that:
- {ns}name is not more standard than ns#name;
- ns#name seemed more consistent with what we're doing with IRIs in composites;
- I don't think that there's a real code issue, as lastIndexOf should work.

So it feels like a change for the sake of changing, and generating more work and complexity, since now we'll have to support two different notations for a while, {ns}name and ns#name...

But if changing this makes you happier, go ahead I don't have any strong technical objections against it.

--
Jean-Sebastien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to