I was looking at Torque and it provides among other facilities, db schema <-> schema xml Now if we take SDO and DAS, do we have a way to assist users in SDO static model xsds <-> DB Schema? It may be helpful as a utility/tool so users will save efforts when either one (static model or db schema) is present and they need to use DAS in static way. Please let me know if I am missing any existing tools or if there are known issues in this.
Regards, Amita On Nov 22, 2007 3:12 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are quite a few Apache projects that Tuscany is already using in one > way or another. Looking through the list of all the projects on the Apache > web site gives some inspiration for other things that we could look into. > Here is a summary of a quick spin through the list trying to pick out the > Apache projects that we do/could use or that could possibly use Tuscany. In > reality I know very little of the details of these project so this is pure > speculation. But if there are experts out there with an interested in > Tuscany we could come up with some real ideas. > > From this list the MINA project looks immediately interesting to me as it > could help out with some more performant default bindings and 'in JVM' > bindings using pipe IO. Also the OFBiz project is something that I hadn't > come across before and could provide some useful use cases. The OFBiz site > talks about a "Loosely coupled multi-layer component architecture" and it > set me thinking about how their components might sit in an SCA runtime. > > Anyhow if anyone has ideas (or time:-), or if this is already happening and > it just isn't very visible, then it would be great to hear. > > ActiveMQ > We use in binding.jms and binding.ws > Are there adapters on ActiveMQ side that could be constructed > Coccon > Could we include SCA components in the component pipeline? > Commons > There are parts of Tuscany that could be more generally useful, for > example, > graph driven databinding framework > a scdl4j tool could be built > Validation > Could validation be used with SCDL > Data > Does DAS have a role here? > Directory > LDAP DAS > Use Directory as a registry implementation > Felix > We are using this for our OSGi support > Harmony > Could we get Tuscany running on Harmony? > James > Wrap James components with SCA services? > MINA > Could use as the domain transport > Develop a MINA binding > Myfaces (Tapestry, Struts, Tiles, Turbine, Wicket, Sling) > There are many tools related to web app development > We could certainly use some of these tools in any monitoring and > management apps we need but is there value in tighter integration? > For example, Turbine talks about SOA, could we provide some > infrastructure for them? > ODE > We are using this for our BPEL support > We could offer a patch to update their website to include Tuscany as a > user > OFBiz > Looks interesting as they talk of services and components and of service > based logic > OpenJPA > We use this in our new openJPA implementation > I don't know if we a re contributing to the project though. > Portals > Could we do something along the lines of wiring in portlets as part of an > SCA composite like we do with javascript > Velocity > Be interesting to have a velocity implementation type > Not sure how refs would be done > Synapse > Has been discussed on the mailing list. I believe, in the first instance, > the proposal is to use SCA composites as a configuration alternative. > Be interesting to look how be can introduce it to the SCA domain > Muse > We some management interfaces and WSDM is an option > Abdera > Use as an alternative Atom engine (we use Rome at the moment) > Cxf > Could resurrect the CxF binding. There used to be one but it doesn't work > anymore > CxF could have an SDO binding > FTP > Would be good to have an FTP binding in a similar vein to the HTTP > binding > Could be used as a deployment vehicle in the distributed runtime case > Lokai > Don't know the details of this but we need some management framework so > we should look to see what this does > Qpid > We could use as an alternative messaging transport. Plug into binding.jms > ? > ServiceMix > We could connect to it > Could configuration be described (as has been proposed for Synapse). > Camel? > How could it be included in the SCA Domain? > StdCxx > I seem to remember discussion about this re. the Native runtime. Can't > remember whether we use it or not now. > XAP > Could we integrate with our Web2.0 story > > Regards > > Simon > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
