On Nov 27, 2007 2:29 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:25 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've just committed a runtime-war module as a start of whats being > > talked > > about here, which could be merged or replace distribution/webapp at some > > point. I'll post some more details later. One comment inline below: > > > > ...ant > > > > On Nov 23, 2007 6:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > I'm with you up to this point. What Tomcat deep integration work is > > going > > > on > > > (I do know about the Geronimo stuff). > > > > > > > > > > > - fix Tomcat deep integration and document how to do it (by copying > > the > > > > binary lib directory jars to Tomcat lib etc) > > > > > > > I don't think anyone has done much with Tomcat deep integration since M1 > > days, i tried it a while back but there were varrious class loader > > issues. > > With all the fixing up of class loaders done for osgi recently this may > > work > > ok now, i just tried moving all the jars from the runtime-war from the > > war > > lib folder to the Tomcat lib folder and it all seems to keep working ok > > now > > so maybe we just need to test it a bit more and then document it. > > > > ...ant > > > So when the contribution is a war in its own right what you say last is > the solution? Or is there something else? > > Right, though for deep integration to work we'd still need some new code that looks in each war as its deployed for .composite files and sca-contibution.xmls, and i guess to do it properly also something like the implementation.web that was mentioned a while ago.
...ant
