How does ServiceMix compare to Tuscany or SCA:
http://servicemix.apache.org/how-does-servicemix-compare-to-tuscany-or-sca.html

theserverside thread:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38049

Comparing SCA, Java EE and JBI:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2824

On Dec 9, 2007 4:44 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes.  I've also been asked a few times about how Tuscany compares with ESB.
> If not for anything it would be good atleast from the standpoint of
> positioning Tuscany vs ESB.  Are there any documentation that positions SCA
> vis-a-vis ESB  ?
>
> - Venkat
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 6:21 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (forwarded to dev list from user list to discuss this esb aspect)
> >
> > I'm interested in this ESB aspect and wonder wouldn't it be good to have
> > some sort of ESB like thing as part of Tuscany.  You can use SCA in an
> > ESB,
> > Tuscany with all its bindings and implementation types has a lot of
> > similar
> > functionality to other open source ESBs. Its quite a big leap to get
> > people
> > to switch to using Tuscany/SCA for developing entire applications so
> > having
> > something like a "Tuscany ESB" could provide a stepping stone to give
> > people
> > exposure to SCA without such a big up front commitment.
> >
> > Does anyone else think this is an area worth exploring?
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Dec 7, 2007 5:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: What is Tuscany?
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Tuscany is not an ESB offering. My understanding is that it's closer to
> > the
> > business application developers by providing a service assembly model and
> > programming model. The ESB will provide the flexible IT infrastructure
> > that
> > composite applications can be deployed.
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to