On Dec 12, 2007 8:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think the tomcat deep integration, JMS, or distribution structure > changes would all be done by next week. Haven't seen much happening with > jsonrpc references recently either. We do have all of the rest of this > year > to continue development though right? > > ...ant > > On Dec 11, 2007 10:59 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Following on from the JIRA tidy up note here are a few high level areas > > that > > I've seen activity on over the last few weeks and so may be ready to go > > for > > release 1.1. > > > > Deep tomcat integration > > Better JMS support > > JAXB based POJO transformations. > > More policy function > > Modeling of client side java script components > > JSONRPC reference binding > > Better support for doman API suggested by assembly spec > > Domain based and standalone node operation > > Domain lookup for remote access to domain services. > > Transactions > > JPA > > Class loading and OSGI > > BPEL fixes > > Distribution structure changes > > > > Can you fill in the detail and tell me what we can get in, i.e.add what > is > > missing from the list, add details to what is on the list, indicate what > > shouldn't be on the list. Think of this as forming the CHANGES text so > it > > should look like [1]. Even better go and update the CHANGES doc:-) > > > > As a reminder here is the timeline I'm working to. I'm planning on > > spending > > next week working on the first RC. Building the distribution, fixing > > samples, READMES, licenses etc. The objective being to have a release > > candidate before I go away for the holidays for people to review at > their > > leisure. This means that when everyone is back we can spend the week > > beginning 7th Jan knocking it into shape until we get an RC we can vote > > on. > > The following week, beginning 14th would also be taken up by voting with > a > > view to releasing the week beginning 21st (or earlier if we get done). > > > > Does that still sound reasonable to everyone. Are there pieces of > function > > that must be in 1.1. that can't be done in this timescale? > > > > Regards > > > > Simon > > > > [1] > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES > > > Well I want to make a first release candidate before I go away for Christmas so I want to get all of the things that affect the shape of the distribution decided before the end of next week. I.e I want to know what's in it and I want to know what it's going to look like in terms of the jars that are built and the dependencies that we have.
If you choose to spend the Christmas holiday improving what is committed to the release then that's great. We can then go through the process of voting on and no doubt polishing further release candidates when we get back in the new year. Does the timeline in the new year look good? So, of the things you mention, I think JMS is the most important given the number of mails we have had about it. Do you think there will be some JMS content to include on this basis? Regards Simon
