On Dec 12, 2007 5:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The same interface type can be referenced by many references/services XML
> declarations. At this moment, whenever an <interface.xxx> is present in
> the
> SCDL, we create an instance of XXXInterface. Ideally, we should have a
> separate model to capture the representation of an interface type, for
> example, JavaInterfaceType for a java interface. The Interface is for the
> XML declaration of <interface.xxx> and InterfaceType is for the underlying
> interface type (such as Java interface or WSDL portType).
>
> public interface Interface {
> ...
> InterfaceType getType(); // return the type of the interface
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:23 AM
> Subject: Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?
>
>
> > On Dec 12, 2007 3:23 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of an
> >> answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious answer
> right
> >> away...
> >>
> >> Is there a simple way for a binding to say what data binding it wants
> >> used?
> >>
> >> I know there's Interface.resetDataBinding but to use that you need the
> >> same
> >> Interface object that is used by the DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor
> >> when
> >> working out if a transformation is required and that doesn't seem to be
> >> the
> >> one thats use by the RuntimeComponentReference/Service which is passed
> in
> >> to
> >> a Service or Reference BindingProvider. Even in a simple testcase with
> a
> >> component using a reference there seems to be about 6 instances of
> >> JavaInterface instantiated for the interface class used by the
> reference
> >> so
> >> making sure resetDataBinding is called on the correct one doesn't seem
> >> straight forward.
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> > Ant
> >
> > An aside. Any idea why there are so many copies of the interface object?
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So I think you are saying there should be
- a object that represents the interface that can be found in the
contribution - the type
- an object that represents the element <interface.?/> - the declaration
- a relationship between the two.
Simon
