Though this gives unwrapped xml, is there something to set somewhere so it gives wrapped style xml?
...ant On Dec 12, 2007 5:27 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks! > > ...ant > > > On Dec 12, 2007 5:11 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please use XMLStringDataBinding.NAME instead. The current name is > > "java.lang.String" but we may change it. > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "tuscany-dev" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 8:58 AM > > Subject: Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding? > > > > > > > And a vaguely related supplementary question...what is (or is there) a > > > data > > > binding for getting xml text. I thought there was and have been trying > > to > > > use "xml.string" but that doesn't seem to work as getTransformerChain > > in > > > MeadiatorImpl always throws a "No path found for the transformation:" > > > exception. Do we have a databinding for this? > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > On Dec 12, 2007 3:23 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of > > an > > >> answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious answer > > right > > >> away... > > >> > > >> Is there a simple way for a binding to say what data binding it wants > > >> used? > > >> > > >> I know there's Interface.resetDataBinding but to use that you need > > the > > >> same Interface object that is used by the > > >> DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor > > >> when working out if a transformation is required and that doesn't > > seem to > > >> be > > >> the one thats use by the RuntimeComponentReference/Service which is > > >> passed > > >> in to a Service or Reference BindingProvider. Even in a simple > > testcase > > >> with > > >> a component using a reference there seems to be about 6 instances of > > >> JavaInterface instantiated for the interface class used by the > > reference > > >> so > > >> making sure resetDataBinding is called on the correct one doesn't > > seem > > >> straight forward. > > >> > > >> ...ant > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >
