On Dec 12, 2007 10:03 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 12, 2007 9:45 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Following Ant's question, after you cut the first RC, development > > would continue on trunk or on a branch ? Based on the timeframe and > > considering we would still work on issues on the week of Jan 7th, I'd > > recommend continue on trunk until sometime around end of year. > > > > On Dec 12, 2007 12:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't think the tomcat deep integration, JMS, or distribution > > structure > > > changes would all be done by next week. Haven't seen much happening > with > > > jsonrpc references recently either. We do have all of the rest of this > > year > > > to continue development though right? > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > > On Dec 11, 2007 10:59 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Following on from the JIRA tidy up note here are a few high level > > areas > > > > that > > > > I've seen activity on over the last few weeks and so may be ready to > > go > > > > for > > > > release 1.1. > > > > > > > > Deep tomcat integration > > > > Better JMS support > > > > JAXB based POJO transformations. > > > > More policy function > > > > Modeling of client side java script components > > > > JSONRPC reference binding > > > > Better support for doman API suggested by assembly spec > > > > Domain based and standalone node operation > > > > Domain lookup for remote access to domain services. > > > > Transactions > > > > JPA > > > > Class loading and OSGI > > > > BPEL fixes > > > > Distribution structure changes > > > > > > > > Can you fill in the detail and tell me what we can get in, > i.e.addwhat is > > > > missing from the list, add details to what is on the list, indicate > > what > > > > shouldn't be on the list. Think of this as forming the CHANGES text > so > > it > > > > should look like [1]. Even better go and update the CHANGES doc:-) > > > > > > > > As a reminder here is the timeline I'm working to. I'm planning on > > > > spending > > > > next week working on the first RC. Building the distribution, fixing > > > > samples, READMES, licenses etc. The objective being to have a > release > > > > candidate before I go away for the holidays for people to review at > > their > > > > leisure. This means that when everyone is back we can spend the week > > > > beginning 7th Jan knocking it into shape until we get an RC we can > > vote > > > > on. > > > > The following week, beginning 14th would also be taken up by voting > > with a > > > > view to releasing the week beginning 21st (or earlier if we get > done). > > > > > > > > Does that still sound reasonable to everyone. Are there pieces of > > function > > > > that must be in 1.1. that can't be done in this timescale? > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>< > http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > If people are agreed that any work that gets committed to trunk over the > Christmas holidays is related to fixing up the content of the release > candidate contents we finalize next week then I'm happy to keep that > effort > going on trunk with a view to cutting the branch including all of the > fixes > people have made when I get back on the 2nd Jan. We could hope to use this > "RC0" to catch 90% of the release issues and reduce the pain a little for > this 90% by allowing the fixes to happen in just one place. > > If people have other projects in mind that take the trunk in a different > direction then I'll take a branch next week. > > Simon >
Doing it next year sounds good to me, i've no plans to start on new stuff not related to 1.1 over the break but i would find it useful to have that time to finish things off. ...ant
