On Jan 3, 2008 4:46 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HI Simon Laws, > > I just did a clean build of the itests yet again without updating the > modules (just to leave it to what I committed last) and they seem to build > ok. > > - Venkat > > On Jan 3, 2008 9:36 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just verified with IBM JDK and it seems to go fine with the security > > setup mentioned in the README, this sample succeeds. > > > > Thanks. > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > On Jan 2, 2008 8:36 PM, Mike Edwards < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Looks like there are differences between the IBM JDK and Sun JDK on > this > > > point. Certainly, the underlying security implementations within > those > > > JDKs are very different. It is going to be necessary to double check > > > any security related code against both of those JDKs. > > > > > > Yours, Mike. > > > > > > Simon Laws wrote: > > > > On Jan 2, 2008 11:56 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I did a full checkout of Java SCA and tried to build it. I got the > > > >> following failure in samples/calculator-implementation-policies. > > > >> Looking at the messages, I see validation errors followed by a > > > >> problem with login configuration. Does anyone have ideas on why > > > >> this sample is failing? > > > >> > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > I'm assuming these are somehow connected to the recent policy > related > > > > changes. I'll have a poke around here in case I've messed up > something > > > > locally. Venkat, can you double check you clean build? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Hi Venkat, was that on the IBM or Sun JDK? I'm on the IBM JDK and it worked for be. I believe the people that were having problems were on Sun.
Simon
