ant elder wrote:
I thought that the scenarios I described earlier helped describe the
problem, which boils down to:
domain != node
so domain URI != node URI
trying to make them equal is just wrong, and will break as soon as
there's 2 nodes in a domain.
Ok but in the non-distributed case with just a single standalone node then
domain is the same as node isn't it, so domain uri could be the same as node
uri?
That can only be a coincidence when there's only 1 node, I can only
repeat what I said above, sorry: that's wrong as soon as there's 2 nodes
in the domain.
The specs don't mention nodes, maybe what we need is to do 1.7.2 for nodes
and have a node base URI, i think that at least would help with all the WS
endpoint problems we keep getting.
I think [1] is going in the same direction with a more general and
cleaner approach.
[1] http://marc.info/?l=tuscany-dev&m=119810821012389
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
