On Jan 30, 2008 2:08 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 2008 1:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 30, 2008 11:14 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 2008 10:02 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about the files that are in SVN but missing from the > > source > > > > > > archive? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Sebb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are still some files in the tag, from which the > > released > > > > > > > artifacts (binary and source) are constructed that are not > > included > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > release artifacts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is that? > > > > > > > > > > > > Are the files obsolete? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some are the .svg files from which the .png files you see in the > > samples > > > > are > > > > > created. We decided not to ship them but useful to have them in > > the > > > > branch > > > > > in case we need to adjust the pictures. > > > > > > > > > > Looking back at the list in the first post to this thread, I see > > most of > > > > > these when I unpacked the source zip on windows just now but the > > > > selection I > > > > > have looked at are empty directories. I took a look in the tar > > archive > > > > and > > > > > they seem to be there also. What archive did you use and what > > platform > > > > are > > > > > you on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zip, Windows. > > > > > > > > tools/maven/maven-incremental-build/src > > > > > > > > contains two java files but the others do seem to be empty. > > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Hmmm. Looks like that source is chopped out when the distribution is > > built > > > as it lives under a path with the word "build" in it. The distribution > > > builder assumes this is a temporary directory and removes it. I'm not > > overly > > > concerned in this specific case as this tool is a non essential > > utility. > > > It's a maven plugin that provides some simple incremental build > > function. > > > Tuscany is no less functional without it and it's not used by default. > > We > > > need to fix this in the next release. > > > > > > > OK. > > > > Might be better for the dist. builder to only exclude specified paths, > > otherwise this could cause other problems in the future... > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Agreed. > > Simon > To follow up on this, over on the project vote thread Sebastien raised a a JIRA (TUSCANY-2024) to cover the two missing files from the incremental build tool folder. You can find it here.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2024 Regards Simon
