Scott Kurz wrote:
Some examples of what I meant..
For the service instance I'm invoking I'd like to know:
* target JVM is it the same as the client instance? (is this a
"Node" in Tuscany terms?, sorry of my ignorance)
* target classloader (if it's not the same or a child I can't do PBR)
* target DB (if it's the same maybe I can do PBR)
* is target annotated with @AllowsPBR
It looks like these are things that a binding knows about.
So, is it fair to say that it would be better to not have a magic
databinding interceptor added automatically to the invocation chain and
instead let the binding decide to copy or not or transform or not based
on its knowledge of the target that it's talking to?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
