Do we really need a "sample" for this? I've been wondering if our samples are getting a bit out of control and we're using them as tests instead of things that users would really want to see. For this JMS case the < binding.jms> element in the .composite would be identical to whats already there for the standalone helloworld JMS sample so why do we need a webapp version? If the intention is really to test JMS in a webapp then what about the work thats going on with itests in webapps - wont that be testing JMS by using the existing jms itest?
...ant On Feb 4, 2008 7:41 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this is a common scenario, and it would be great to have it > available in Tuscany. I have created a jira [1] for this. > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2026 > > On Feb 1, 2008 12:44 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2008 7:45 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I was trying to find a JMS web app sample, do we have any ? > > > > > > > No. I had considered making one but have left all webapp things for now > till > > the discussions around what runtimes we support get resolved. > > > > > > > Also, in the context of a web application, can I have two web > > > applications talking to each other using Tuscany SCA JMS ? > > > > > > > Sure, they just need to be using the same JMS broker. > > > > ...ant > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
