On Feb 15, 2008 11:16 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> I've spotted there's no FAQs for using Tuscany with Weblogic, so I > >> thought I'd throw something together to help :) > >> > >> Over on my blog: > >> > >> > http://davesowerby.blogspot.com/2008/02/using-tuscany-with-weblogic.html > >> > >> It covers the updates necessary to webapps and then an example of how > to > >> deploy. > >> > >> If you think it'll be useful, please feel free to link from the FAQs > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Dave. > >> > > Dave, > > It's very useful. Thanks! > > Would you be OK if we copied the steps you've given to our Wiki? I'm > asking because I think that blogspot is not accessible from China for > example, so a whole part of the world will not be able to get these > instructions from your blog, but could get them from the Tuscany Wiki. > > > > > Wouldn't it be good if the Tuscany samples just worked out-of-the-box on > > Weblogic and didn't need this manual moving of the .composite file? > > Yes, +1 > > I know > > this is going to be yet another facet of the ongoing runtime and > > contributions discussions but in the meantime if we move the webapp > samples > > .composite files into the meta-inf folder then the samples would just > work > > everywhere. > > That's not a good idea IMO as meta-inf is not where people expect to > place their normal development artifacts. I'd prefer if we fixed the > Tuscany contribution processing to correctly handle WARs and support > JARs under the lib/ folder. > > Sure, its not ideal...but its what has to be done to make it work with the code as it is today. Happy to wait and see if the contribution service does get fixed but if its not by the next release i think it would be better if we we change this so we have some samples work in WebLogic. ...ant
