kelvin goodson wrote:
Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany community
that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development. When this
thread is referenced in proposal for the new project, or discussions around
it, it must be clear to the wider Apache community that the Tuscany
community accepts that. Without this clear acceptance I fear the new
project will face further periods of delay whilst questions are asked about
the Tuscany communities intentions with regards to SDO Java development.
So the answer to your question is conditional.
If the new project is accepted an an incubator ....
- does not require Tuscany to implement SDO anymore --- yes
- and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- no
- and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related technology? ---
yes
if the project is not accepted as an incubator ...
- does not require Tuscany to implement SDO anymore --- yes
- and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- yes
- and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related technology? ---
yes
I'm trying to understand how to vote, or if I should vote, on your other
thread. Maybe I'm missing something. There is an SDO implementation in
Tuscany at the moment. SDO is a "related technology" worked on in
OpenCSA too. Why would we want to remove it from the charter?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
