On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Nishant Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > MessageProcessor is working fine for me... but i want to know that how we > can handle the response tag for it, as I am removing it from method > "insertPayloadIntoJMSMessage"... > so here in response tag of method "extractPayloadFromJMSMessage"... > String xml = "<response xmlns=\" > http://this.should.be.pulled.from.the.composite.somehow\<http://this.should.be.pulled.from.the.composite.somehow/>">" > + ((TextMessage)msg).getText() + "</response>"; > > which is still working fine for me... so is there any rule there to build > with tag in reponse... or how can we get(or generate) the tag from tuscany > without using any hardcode tag? > > Here string xmlns=\" > http://this.should.be.pulled.from.the.composite.somehow\<http://this.should.be.pulled.from.the.composite.somehow/>" > is arbitrary put to see the result and its gone fine... but this is not > expected from my side. it should not work as in request it is <arg0 xmlns=" > http://jms.sample.com/";>.... > > Hope this make sense... > > -- > Thanks > Nishant Joshi > Hi Nishant, I'm still working on a good design of the jms binding to support this type of thing but one question in the meantime - >From what you have above it looks like the actual payload context of the JMS message you send and receive is a simple String instead of the the jms binding is always using XML as it does now. This has come up on another thread [1] so if we had some mechanism to control whether or not the binding uses xml would that avoid this issue you're asking about here? ...ant [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/l6ae2xke5lrs4u7c
