Scott Kurz wrote:
I think we have another case to deal with in bindings like the Axis2
binding, which is the case that the user provides a portType on <
interface.wsdl>
without a full port.

So the SCDL would look like:

<component name="JAXBTestComponent1">
        <implementation.java ...>
        <service...>
            <interface.wsdl interface="http://blah#wsdl.interface(Blah)" />
            <binding.ws/>
        ....

I admit I haven't run this test, but when I look at this code it looks like
if I find an <interface.wsdl> I'm going to assume
I don't need to generate a port.

    public Axis2ServiceBindingProvider(RuntimeComponent component,
                                       RuntimeComponentService service,
                                       WebServiceBinding wsBinding,
                                       ServletHost servletHost,
                                       MessageFactory messageFactory) {

        this.wsBinding = wsBinding;

        InterfaceContract contract = wsBinding.getBindingInterfaceContract
();
        if (contract == null) {
            contract = service.getInterfaceContract
().makeUnidirectional(false);
            if ((contract instanceof JavaInterfaceContract)) {
                contract =
Java2WSDLHelper.createWSDLInterfaceContract((JavaInterfaceContract)contract,
requiresSOAP12(wsBinding));
            }
            wsBinding.setBindingInterfaceContract(contract);
        }


I think that, not only should we still be able to generate a port in this
case, but we should start from the <intf.wsdl>, not the Java.

Any thoughts on this before I open a JIRA?

I think the code currently handles this case.  There is code in
Axis2ServiceClient.setServiceAndPort() to take care of this possibility
by generating a service and port if necessary.  This method is called by
Axis2ServiceProvider.createWSDLAxisService().

  Simon


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to