I have created a TUSCANY-2090 to add a testcase for this issue so that we don't regress.
++Vamsi On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Simon Laws wrote: > > > Hi Simon > > > > > > Do you have Daniel's test in a position where you could check it in? > > > > > I do have his test running, but for some reason it never failed > > for me, even when the printlns showed the incorrect conversation ID > > was being used. So I just used the printlns to debug the problem > > and verify my fix. > > > > Simon > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Ah, I see. Fair enough. > > Simon >
