I have changed trunk poms to be "2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT" for now. This is available under svn revision #639026.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My goal here is just to avoid having the release and trunk sharing the > same version in the pom. As for Ant's suggestion, I'll take a look and > see if that causes any issue on the build. > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:36 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Now that we are near the release of Java SCA 1,2, I'd like to propose > > > > changing the trunk pom version to "2-incubating-SNAPSHOT" around the > > > > same time we create the SCA 1.2 release branch. > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>< > > > http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > Are the implications of having 2-incubating... that we are due a major > > > revision change? In that case what our our plans for. > > > > > > - development for this new major revision. I imagine for example we > might > > > want to look at tidying our SPIs but did you have something specific in > > > mind? > > > > > > - support for our 1.x codebase. If the implication of 2-... is that we > are > > > going to do some big breaking changes then we probably need a 1.x branch > > > post 1.2 to allow us to support, for a while, anyone on the current > code. > > > > > > So the answer here may not be to go directly to 2 on the back of 1.2 but > > > to > > > get 1.2 out of the door and then branch to 1.x and 2 if that is what > > > people > > > think is appropriate, i.e. treat release 1.2 and the move toward a new > > > major > > > revision as separate issues. > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > I think the time for v2 is approaching and have suggested it recently: > > http://apache.markmail.org/message/ixfiu3zq7xdo34rz > > > > But this is one of the advantages of using the simple "SNAPSHOT" for the > > trunk version - we don't need to think about what the next release will be > > and would never need to change the trunk version again. > > > > ...ant > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
