Aah...  types is not null but types.getExtensibilityElements() is empty
which results in document being null as described in the JIRA comments.

++Vamsi

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
> I have set a break point in
> Java2WSDLHelper.processNoArgAndVoidReturnMethods() at line 341.  But, with
> my test case, I am not hitting the condition where types is null as
> described in the JIRA comments in TUSCANY-2059.
>
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Comments inline.
> >
> >   Simon
> >
> > Raymond Feng wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The message is a bit misleading and it complains that a fault from WS
> > > stack cannot be mapped to a java checked exception. The cause of your
> > > issue is:
> > >
> > >> Caused by: org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: An unknown message label has
> > been
> > >> encountered: In
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.axis2.description.OutOnlyAxisOperationClient.getMessageContext
> > (
> > >>
> > >> OutOnlyAxisOperation.java:215)
> > >>    at
> > >
> > > I ran into a similar issue before. The problem is that Axis2 maps a
> > java
> > > method such as void doSomthing(...) into an oneway WSDL operation.
> > This
> > > behavior is not in line with SCA which requires @Oneway annotation. If
> > > you add @Oneway to the method, the problem will be gone.
> > >
> > This is the same as TUSCANY-2059.  The behaviour that Raymond
> > describes is the default for Axis2.  However, Tuscany has code
> > in Java2WSDLHelper.processNoArgAndVoidReturnMethods() to fix
> > up the Axis2 Java to WSDL mapping to correct this Axis2 problem.
> > Unfortunately, this code is currently not invoked when all
> > methods of an interface have null argument lists and void
> > return types.  See TUSCANY-2059 for more details.
> >
> > Adding @OneWay works around the problem but it changes the
> > semantic behavior.  It prevents server-side exceptions from
> > being thrown back to the client, and it allows the client to
> > proceed before the server method has completed.  It also
> > requires modifying the existing Java interface, which isn't
> > always possible.  This may be useful as a temporary workaround,
> > but we need to fix the underlying problem.
> >
> > Vamsi, are you interested in producing a patch for
> > Java2WSDLHelper.processNoArgAndVoidReturnMethods() to fix this
> > problem?  The comments for TUSCANY-2059 give some suggestions
> > for what is neeeded.
> >
> >   Simon
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Raymond
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 6:38 AM
> > > To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Strange problem with conversational service when using
> > binding.ws
> > >
> > >> Here is a strange problem I am running into.
> > >>
> > >> I have a conversational service with all the operations returning
> > void.
> > >> When I use binding.sca, my test runs fine.  But, when I change the
> > >> binding
> > >> to binding.ws, I hit an org.osoa.sca.ServiceRuntimeException: "Target
> > >> fault
> > >> type cannot be resolved: null".  But, if a add another method to my
> > >> service
> > >> to return a String (non-void basically), then my test runs fine even
> > >> though
> > >> this newly added method is not invoked!!  Stack trace from the
> > failure is
> > >> given below.
> > >>
> > >> org.osoa.sca.ServiceRuntimeException: Target fault type cannot be
> > >> resolved:
> > >> null
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.databinding.wire.DataTransformationInterceptor.invoke
> > >>
> > >> (DataTransformationInterceptor.java:134)
> > >>    at
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.JDKInvocationHandler.invoke(
> > >> JDKInvocationHandler.java:286)
> > >>    at
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.JDKInvocationHandler.invoke(
> > >> JDKInvocationHandler.java:154)
> > >>    at $Proxy26.operation1(Unknown Source)
> > >>    at org.apache.tuscany.sca.mytest.MyConvClientImpl.runConversation(
> > >> MyConvClientImpl.java:21)
> > >>    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >>    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> > >>    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> > >>    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.invocation.JavaImplementationInvoker.invoke
> > >>
> > >> (JavaImplementationInvoker.java:109)
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.databinding.wire.PassByValueInterceptor.invoke
> > (
> > >>
> > >> PassByValueInterceptor.java:108)
> > >>    at
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.impl.SCABindingInvoker.invoke(
> > >> SCABindingInvoker.java:61)
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.databinding.wire.PassByValueInterceptor.invoke
> > (
> > >>
> > >> PassByValueInterceptor.java:108)
> > >>    at
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.JDKInvocationHandler.invoke(
> > >> JDKInvocationHandler.java:286)
> > >>    at
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.JDKInvocationHandler.invoke(
> > >> JDKInvocationHandler.java:154)
> > >>    at $Proxy25.runConversation(Unknown Source)
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.itest.conversational.ConversationWSDLMyTestCase.testConversation
> > >>
> > >> (ConversationWSDLMyTestCase.java:68)
> > >>    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >>    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> > >>    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> > >>    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.executeMethodBody(
> > >> TestMethodRunner.java:99)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runUnprotected(
> > >> TestMethodRunner.java:81)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(
> > >> BeforeAndAfterRunner.java:34)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runMethod(
> > >> TestMethodRunner.java:75)
> > >>    at
> > >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.run(TestMethodRunner.java
> > >> :45)
> > >>    at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.invokeTestMethod(
> > >> TestClassMethodsRunner.java:75)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.run(
> > >> TestClassMethodsRunner.java:36)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner$1.runUnprotected(
> > >> TestClassRunner.java:42)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(
> > >> BeforeAndAfterRunner.java:34)
> > >>    at org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner.run(
> > TestClassRunner.java
> > >> :52)
> > >>    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(
> > >> JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
> > >>    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(
> > >> TestExecution.java:38)
> > >>    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
> > (
> > >> RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> > >>    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
> > (
> > >> RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> > >>    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(
> > >> RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> > >>    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(
> > >> RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> > >> Caused by: org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: An unknown message label has
> > been
> > >> encountered: In
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.axis2.description.OutOnlyAxisOperationClient.getMessageContext
> > (
> > >>
> > >> OutOnlyAxisOperation.java:215)
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.Axis2BindingInvoker.invokeTarget
> > (
> > >> Axis2BindingInvoker.java:120)
> > >>    at
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.Axis2BindingInvoker.invoke(
> > >> Axis2BindingInvoker.java:89)
> > >>    at
> > >>
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.databinding.wire.DataTransformationInterceptor.invoke
> > >>
> > >> (DataTransformationInterceptor.java:78)
> > >>    ... 36 more
> > >>
> > >> Has anyone reported this problem?  Otherwise I will create a JIRA.
> > >>
> > >> ++Vamsi
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to