[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Scott Kurz updated TUSCANY-2189: -------------------------------- Attachment: test.2189.jar Sorry this doesn't exactly match the SCDL pasted it the JIRA text but it's the same idea > Problems building the wire for a service implemented by Composite > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TUSCANY-2189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2189 > Project: Tuscany > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Java SCA Core Runtime > Reporter: Scott Kurz > Fix For: Java-SCA-Next > > Attachments: test.2189.jar > > > Take something like this: > <composite name="OuterComposite"> > <component name="OuterCalculatorComponent"> > <service name="OuterCalculatorService"> > <binding.ws wsdlElement="...."/> > </service> > <implementation.composite name="calc:InnerComposite"/> > </component> > </composite> > <composite name="InnerComposite"> > <service name="OuterCalculatorService" > promote="CalculatorComponent/CalculatorService"/> > <component name="CalculatorComponent"> > <service name="CalculatorService"/> > <implementation.java class="calculator.CalculatorServiceImpl"/> > </component> > </composite> > ------------------------------------------ > I'm noticing that the wireTarget that ends up getting built for the wire from > the OuterCalculatorService service-side WS binding into the impl has a > wireTarget > with a Composite impl. This causes a problem when > RuntimeWireImpl.initInvocationChains() calls addImplementationInterceptor(); > we need a non-composite impl (Java impl) at this point to set up the > interceptor on the chain. > Might it be appropriate to do something like what's done in > CompositeWireBuilderImpl.connectComponentReferences(), where we drill down > recursively to unwrap the Composite impl services? > I looked at the 'recursive' itest and didn't see anything besides > binding.sca... so maybe we don't think we've gotten to this yet. > In the cases it does work, with binding.sca, we must somehow be connected to > the "inner"-layer wire from the component in the nested Composite. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]