[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12590878#action_12590878
 ] 

ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2241:
------------------------------------

Many thanks for the fix, it looks ok to me but some of our existing tests have 
EndpointReferences where its actually invalid so with this fix applied there 
are test failures (try building binding-ws-axis2 with this fix applied to find 
them). Could you also supply a patch to fix those? 

> EndpointReference in binding.ws when wsdlElement is not of 'Binding' form
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-2241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2241
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.2, Java-SCA-Next
>            Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
>            Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
>             Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>
>         Attachments: TUSCANY-2241.patch
>
>
> Web Service Binding Specification v1.0 - Sec 2.1 - Lines 61 to 65:
> 61 • /binding.ws/wsa:EndpointReference - optional WS-Addressing [6] 
> EndpointReference
> 62 that specifies the endpoint for the service or reference. When this 
> element is present along
> 63 with the wsdlElement attribute on the parent element, the wsdlElement 
> attribute value MUST
> 64 be of the 'Binding' form as specified above, i.e. <WSDL-namespace-
> 65 URI>#wsdl.binding(<binding-name>).
> I notice that when an EndpointReference is specified inside binding.ws along 
> with a wsdlElement which is not of 'Binding' form, no warning or error is 
> generated.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to