On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that we are making more progress with the SCA & BPEL integration > and have figured out how to make References to work, let's discuss > what could be the next steps on this area. Below are couple examples > of what we could do next > > - WS-BPEL Process Introspection : Currently we are requiring SCA > componentType files, we could introspect the BPEL process file to > generate the component type information from it. > > - Integrate BEPL with the store scenario tutorial : We could add a > OrderProcessing step to the store checkout, and illustrate a more real > integration scenario. > > Other then these, we could review the > SCA_ClientAndImplementationModelFor BPEL and identify other areas that > we might need enhancements. Scenarios / Samples / Demos are always > welcome too. Or if you have other suggestions, feel free to jump to > the discussion. > > BTW: Copying the ODE list in case they want to jump and help, or in > case they have other ideas. > I was thinking about the deployment model as well. Right now you still need a deploy.xml descriptor to tell ODE how to bind a partnerLink to a concrete port. In an SCA context I'm thinking this should be handled by the container. Matthieu > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
