Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I have created a JIRA TUSCANY-2296 describing the problem. I have also
posted a patch file that will help understand the problem better.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Thanks for your contribution to the vtest bucket for @Init and
@Destroy annotations. Can you say why you do not use the SCADomain
APIs to configure the domain and locate services from the test client?
I would like to keep this pattern consistent throughout the entire
suite.
This is a somewhat related question. I am running the sample-store
service via the given Launch class. With Java 2 security off, the
example runs as intended. With Java 2 security on, there is a
ContributionResolveException. It seems that the @Init implementation
scope is added to a protected method, not public.
Here is the first part of the stack trace that I print out using a bit
of extra debug code in JavaImplementationProcessor.resolve method.
JavaImplementationProcessor.resolve
error=org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.introspect.impl.IllegalInitException:
Initializer must be a public method. Invalid annotation @Init found on
protected void services.ShoppingCartImpl.init()
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.introspect.impl.IllegalInitException:
Initializer must be a public method. Invalid annotation @Init found on
protected void services.ShoppingCartImpl.init()
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.introspect.impl.InitProcessor.visitMethod(InitProcessor.java:57)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.impl.JavaClassIntrospectorImpl.introspectClass(JavaClassIntrospectorImpl.java:99)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.impl.JavaImplementationFactoryImpl.createJavaImplementation(JavaImplementationFactoryImpl.java:53)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.xml.JavaImplementationProcessor.resolve(JavaImplementationProcessor.java:152)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.xml.JavaImplementationProcessor.resolve(JavaImplementationProcessor.java:1)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.DefaultStAXArtifactProcessorExtensionPoint$LazyStAXArtifactProcessor.resolve(DefaultStAXArtifactProcessorExtensionPoint.java:287)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.ExtensibleStAXArtifactProcessor.resolve(ExtensibleStAXArtifactProcessor.java:116)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml.BaseAssemblyProcessor.resolveImplementation(BaseAssemblyProcessor.java:271)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml.CompositeProcessor.resolve(CompositeProcessor.java:903)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml.CompositeProcessor.resolve(CompositeProcessor.java:1)
I've checked the SCA_JavaAnnotationsAndAPIs_V100 specification, but I
see no mention that this API be public. What say the SCA experts? Should
these implementation scoped methods be public? Or do you think there
should be more privileged blocks to allow this to run with security on?
Or other?
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
