Hi,
When we reference SCA in the charter, should we use Service Component
Architecture (SCA) instead?
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 5:49 AM
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level
Project
Last call, unless anyone says otherwise i'll be restarting this vote
tomorrow morning using the contents of the wiki page:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution
...ant
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Seems ok to me too.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>>
>> The current draft proposal is at:
>>
>>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution
>>
>> Reviews and updates welcome.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Turns out we're not quite ready yet.
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as
>>>>>
>>>>> the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally
>>>>> vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC.
>>>>> We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have
>>>>> it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for
>>>>> the May board meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Ok I'll cancel this vote then.
>>>>
>>>> ...ant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
> This version looks OK to me.
>
> Simon
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
