Sounds good to me. Kelvin. 2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:24 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning > the > > SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm hoping to drop the "incubating" tag in the release > name. > > > > This has led me to look at the parent pom, and I guess we need a new > > version of parent pom that doesn't reference the incubator repo, and > then > > open a vote on that. I may be opening a whole new kettle of Pandora's > > worms > > that would have been best left unopened for a point release. On the other > > hand I guess it needs doing some time soon. Digging around a few other > top > > level projects, and seeing the comments in our own parent pom, it would > > appear I might be able to just drop the "apache.incubator" repository > > stanza > > in a new revision of the parent pom. Is that true? any guidance would > be > > very welcome. > > > > Kelvin. > > > > How about removing the reference to the Tuscany parent pom and just > defining > whatever is required in the top level SDO pom.xml. We talked about doing > this once before - http://apache.markmail.org/message/2woxtw7lfalm3rtx. > The > only concern was if it caused trouble if building all the subprojects under > tuscany/java together, but does anyone ever do that these days? > > ...ant >
