On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Luciano Resende wrote: > >> > >> How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have > >> couple releases without the necessity to keep updating the trunk pom > >> version. And this would probably make everybody happy :) > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:14 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I guess part of problem here is because a lot of people assume that > >>>> the maven artifact version represents what is going to be our next > >>>> release and then, if it's set as 2.0-SNAPSHOT, it means our next > >>>> release would be 2.0. > >>> > >>> I agree, this is exactly the issue. But I'm not sure its that much of > an > >>> unreasonable assumption, it does feel odd to me to have 2.0-SNAPSHOT as > >>> the > >>> trunk version before there has been any decision to start working on a > >>> 2.0 > >>> in trunk. > >>> > >>> ...ant > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > I'd prefer the next logical number, 1.3 for example. > > > > I still think plain SNAPSHOT would be simplest but as no one else seems to > like that I think I agree with this - the next logical number seems better > than things like 1.x or 2.0 etc. So, I plan to change trunk to 1.4-SNAPSHOT > when the 1.3 branch is taken, do say if you really don't like this but its > what we've been doing most of the time in the past so i hope most can live > with it. > > ...ant > 1.4-SNAPSHOT is OK by me. Simon
