Ron, This is an area of the spec that is full of holes. The bottom line is that in SDO 2.0.1 the Java interface commonj.sdo.DataGraph has no defined relationship to the DataObject that would be created from the complexType BaseDataGraphType, other than the one vaguely implied by this example. DataGraphs are not DataObjects in the current spec, Tuscany, or any other implementation of SDO that I'm aware of. The SDO collaboration group has been discussing changing this in SDO 2.1. The general feeling is that it would be good to make DataGraphs proper DataObjects (it would solve a lot of the other questions like how do you create a DataGraph), but we need to define the behavior of DataGraph/DataObject methods like getDataGraph, getChangeSummary, and getRootObject, some of which are duplicates (declared in both interfaces), and all of which have ambiguous behavior in the combined DataGraph/DataObject case.
As far as Tuscany is concerned, a prereq is to get ChangeSummaryType properties to work - which we've started working on, but still need a few weeks. Once we have that working, we can start implementing DataGraph as a proper DataObject (ahead of the 2.1 spec). After that, I think you could do what your asking for. Short term, I think you're out of luck. Frank. Ron Gavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/10/2006 04:20:32 PM: > I am attempting to use Tuscany SDO to pass a DataGraph as a > parameter to a document-wrapped web service method, similar to the > "Web services and DataGraphs Example" on pages 137-139 in the SDO 2. > 01 specification. In my case, however, I am attempting to wrap the > DataGraph within a statically-generated DataObject that represents > the method being invoked. The relevant portions of the schema are as follows: > > <!-- from the spec --> > <element name="companyDataGraph" type="company:CompanyDataGraphType" /> > <complexType name="CompanyDataGraphType"> > <complexContent> > <extension base="sdo:BaseDataGraphType"> > <sequence> > <element name="company" type="company:CompanyType" /> > </sequence> > </extension> > </complexContent> > </complexType> > > <!-- my addition --> > <xsd:element name="updateCompanies" type="UpdateCompanies" /> > <xsd:complexType name="UpdateCompanies"> > <xsd:sequence> > <xsd:element ref="companyDatagraph" /> > </xsd:sequence> > </xsd:complexType> > > Should a full SDO 2.01 implementation support this use case? If so, > how close is Tuscany to being able to support it? In particular, > when I run Tuscany XSD2JavaGenerator, the class generated for > CompanyDataGraphType extends DataObjectImpl and not DataGraphImpl. > Is fixing this simply a matter of enhancing the XSD2JavaGenerator to > recognize "sdo:BaseDataGraphType" extensions and make these classes > extend DataGraphImpl instead of DataObjectImpl? Is serializing/de- > serializing a DataGraph as a child of a DataObject doable? > > - Ron > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
