I have just posted to the tuscany-dev mailing list to indicate the availablity of an RC1a distribution based on your comments Ron, thanks again.
Regards, Kelvin. On 23/09/06, Ron Gavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kelvin, Thanks for your hard work putting together an RC1 distribution with both source and binaries. A few thoughts... 1. For the binary distribution, I didn't see the sdo tools and plugin classes. I would suggest each appear in a separate jar similar to how M1 was packaged. So, there would be one binary zip with the suite of dependent jars plus individual jars for sdo-spec, sdo-impl, sdo-tools, and sdo-plugin. 2. For the source distribution, I found having two files named using sdo-impl and sdo-spec confusing. The confusion is due to the fact that sdo-impl truly means the sdo-impl component/project for the binary distribution but for the source distribution, sdo-impl really means sdo-impl + sdo-tools + sdo-plugin. In order to avoid such confusion, I would suggest you provide one source zip file containing source for sdo-spec, sdo-impl, sdo-tools, and sdo-plugin. I think this is clearer and more consistent. Thanks again, - Ron kelvin goodson wrote: > I posted a proposal to tuscany-dev a couple of days back > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg08105.html > > So my plan is to crank the handle on SDO Java and when its looking > good enough to post release candidates, I'll make them available on > people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson as has been done before for our C++ > releases. > > Regards, Kelvin. > > On 21/09/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sep 21, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Ron Gavlin wrote: >> >> > Kelvin, >> > >> > Thanks for the update. Do you plan to make a "release candidate" >> > source distribution? If so, do you plan to make it in the same time >> > frame as the binary one? >> > >> >> I'm not sure what Kelvin is thinking here but for SCA I was not >> planning on doing this until we had a real "release candidate" - >> defined as being things that we were actually prepared to vote on. >> >> In the run up to that point I would build SNAPSHOT binary distros >> based on "allegedly good" SVN revisions - the corresponding source >> distro would be the content of the tree as of that revision. >> >> -- >> Jeremy >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
