Thank you Jean-Sebastian,
I was supposing that it wasn't so easy to answer, especially to my last
question, but it didn't discourage me from continuing ;-).
Just to inform you, there was general consensus respect the SCA
initiative, as well as caution because the work is still in progress.
Obviously there were also motivations against the SCA adoption as for
example the reuse of code already developed by the involved partners
;-). But we are still defining the conceptual model so there is room for
any (maybe mixed) solution ... people asked me references.
What I haven't found is a roadmap about the SCA specification, even an
approximate date for the version 1.0 can ease managers to go over their
hesitation (but I understand that it can produce negative effects).
Working in team we are particularly interested in the deployment aspects
of a service networks, so next months I've intention to investigate
such area to give them a practical demo of how SCA can help our
collaborative work.
see you on this ML
regards and happy new year
francesco
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Francesco Furfari wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to push for the adoption of SCA model (Tuscany) in a
project whose development activities will start on the second quarter
of the next year.
Next week there will be a meeting in which I would like to summarize
the status of Tuscany project. In particular, I would like to report
on the
current conformity of Tuscany to the SCA specification, the companion
UI tools that can ease the development (not only those that may be
under the Apache effort, but also e.g. Eclipse), when a final SCA
specification is expected, and if other IT providers are
developing/providing more implementations.
I could gather such information from the web (of course I'm doing),
but I would appreciate whether you give me some hints on the practical
difficulties that we could have when approaching Tuscany.
Thanks in advance
francesco
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Francesco,
I'm not sure if anybody else has already sent you any pointers, as most
of us were on vacation the last 2 weeks, but most of the SCA information
is on our Web site http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany, the OSOA spec
collaboration site http://www.osoa.org and the PHP SOA package at
http://pecl.php.net/package/SCA_SDO
Here are a few more specific pointers:
The latest level of the SCA spec is 0.96 and the OSOA collbatoration is
working towards a 1.0 spec.
You can find a list of early implementations of SCA and SDO (including
Apache Tuscany of course) at
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Early+Implementation+Examples+and+Tools.
The Eclipse SOA tools platform project at http://www.eclipse.org/stp/ is
building Eclipse tools for SCA.
Finally the Tuscany SCA Milestone 2 announcement emails give you a list
of the SCA features and spec levels supported in both the C++ and Java
Tuscany runtimes.
C++ M2:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java M2:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Community discussions on the next steps for Tuscany just started before
the holidays and they're probably going to resume soon on the
[email protected] mailing list.
Feel free to post here or on tuscany-dev if you have more specific
questions. I'll be able to help more with Tuscany C++ related questions
but it looks like most of the people working on Tuscany Java are back
from vacation this week as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
