I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again please. Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the fix for 1223. I have some thoughts that I'm structuring at the moment on what's important for a next release from my perspective that I'll post soon, but in general I'm just keen to get the good stuff that we have added recently out in a release that, as I said before from my perspective, warrants the title of "1.0". With the Summer holiday season coming up, I'd like to do this soon so that I can sun myself on a beach without that niggling feeling of things that ought to have been done ;-)
What say you we put a stake in the ground of aiming for a SDO 1.0 release to be at the IPMC ratification stage by mid-July? So to that end I ask again, if you have requirements that you feel are fundamental to the next release please raise them now; with the caveat of course that the only way to be sure of getting your requirements into the release is to step forward and supply the fixes. -- Kelvin. On 23/05/07, David Adcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kelvin, I would like to see the multiple namepace issue resolved in the XSD2JavaGenerator tool. This issue is covered in JIRA 1223. Optionally, making it available to the plugin (JIRA 303) would be nice. JIRA 1143 is something that I need fixed, as well. So any focus that can be given to that prior to this release would be appreciated. In the spirit of cooperation, I'll be posting a first pass on 1223 a bit later in the week. Thanks, David On 5/21/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: With the beta1 release of SDO Java announced, I have begun thinking about a next release which I believe can be given the version tag 1.0-incubator . We have full coverage of the 2.1 SDO spec in the trunk now, and we currently have 33 open JIRAs. http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=components&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC Please give feedback on those issues which are important to you and, if possible, step up to provide fixes for those issues. If we are to call this the 1.0 release then it ought to provide a really good experience for the user. Please share your experiences about using the beta1 release and make suggestions or contributions to improve the next one. Aside from fixes to the code, key contributions would be to improve the instructions, the samples and the documentation (we already have discussions going on about the shape of the release distributions on another thread). Kelvin. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
