Hi Jean-Sebastien, where is the SCA Java Releases wiki page which lists some work items in ws binding space, that you mentioned?
Thanks, Radim On 8/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > >> Bringing this thread up again as time is ticking on if we want to get a > >> release out this month. How would people feel about taking a branch for > >> this > >> release in a bit less than 2 weeks, say aiming for the 14/15th of August? > >> That should just about give enough time for clean up and voting to get a > >> release out by the end of August. > >> > >> Another thing I wondered about was the name, we've been talking about this > >> being 0.92, how about something higher to show we're getting closer, maybe > >> 0.95 or 0.98 or even 0.99? (that prompts a what/when is 1.0, I'll start a > >> separate thread about that) > >> > >> ...ant > >> > > What/when is 1.0? Good question :) There has been a lot of progress in > the recent 0.90 and 0.91 releases and I agree that Tuscany SCA is > getting close to a 1.0 release. > > So, let's start discussing "What is Tuscany 1.0". I'm moving this thread > to the tuscany-user list as I'd like to get feedback, requests and ideas > from Tuscany users. > > Speaking for myself, here's some thoughts on what I'm interested in > having in a 1.0 release: > > * SCA assembly spec 1.0 support > Looks close to complete here, I think it just needs a little more > testing and a simple implementation of a distributed domain. Simon seems > to be making good progress in that area. Also I'd like to have a simple > admin console to add/remove contributions and composites and allocate > components to nodes. > > * SCA Policy framework 1.0 > Modules policy and policy-xml are taking shape. Having one concrete > policy like Security implemented on top the framework would be good. > Maybe Venkat could give his thoughts on this? > > * Extension points for component implementations, bindings, databindings > and policies > SPIs need a little cleanup as they're starting to carry a number of > deprecated interfaces/methods. There's no extensibility mechanism for > policies yet but it shouldn't be too hard to add that with a pattern > similar to the existing extension points. > > * SCA Java APIs and Annotations 1.0 > Almost complete, just missing a complete implementation of > ServiceReferences and a few conversational annotations. I'd like to > refine the SCADomain.getService() API too. Also, on a separate but > related note, a better Java proxy (better than a JDK proxy) would be > great, I've seen a Cglib proxy contributed recently, how about extending > that idea to all proxies? > > * Spring component implementation > This looks in a good shape. Mike, what else are you planning to do there? > > * WS binding > What is left to do? The SCA Java Releases wiki page lists some work > items in this space, which ones do people think should be done for a 1.0 > release? > > * JMS binding > Seems to partly work but will need a little more to align with the > latest spec. Anybody interested in helping with it? > > * Feed and JSON bindings > IMO important to have to integrate with Web 2.0 apps. The Feed binding > is fine as far as I can tell. What do people think remains to be done > for the JSON binding? > > * Scripting component implementation > I've been a happy user of <implementation.script> but have not tried > using complex types and much integration with bindings. What's left to > be done here? > > * Geronimo integration > I'd like to be able to deploy SCA contributions to Geronimo, looks like > there's good progress on that front. I'd also like to support the > integration of Webapps in SCA compositions as <implementation.web> > components. > > * Docs > Our architecture docs could use some improvements and cleanup :). For > user docs, what do people think about developing more tutorials and > variations around the Online Store tutorial? > > * Samples > Some of them need minor cleanup. Are we missing samples in any specific > area? > > * Other implementation and binding extensions > We have starters or partial support for <implementation.notification>, > <implementation.bpel>, <binding.ejb>, <binding.rmi>, > <implementation.osgi>. Could people help get these extensions in the > release? > > Thoughts? Anything people would like to discuss and get included in > Tuscany SCA 1.0, please bring it up... > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
