It's just a small thing, but I noticed that support for aliasNames seems
to be missing in this release.  This would be nice to add.

One other minor nit, I have some code where I want to use a Wrapper
DataObject (viz Decorator pattern) in order to change the behavior of a
DataObject (e.g. exclude some properties or make them immutable) without
changing the underlying DataObject.  However, this is not easy to do
with Tuscany SDO because the internal routines require that DataObject
and Property also implement some EMF interfaces.  This would be nice to
fix from my perspective, but I suspect it is difficult architecturally
and probably no one else cares :-(.

Anyway, keep up the good work.
Dean.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2007 9:21 PM
> To: Tuscany Users
> Subject: [SDO Java] What shall we do next?
> 
> Having released 1.0-incubating,  what are the priorities for SDO Java
now.
> 
> I'm just catching up on reading the lists having taken a break.  The
> major things I had in mind before going away were to
> 
> - rearrange the project structure to permit generation of java classes
> during maven tests (TUSCANY-1393)
> 
> - add multi-threaded test cases (TUSCANY-1182)
> 
> - for the first of the above, while we are in project reorganisation
> mode it's probably worth fixing TUSCANY-257 to separate out the Java 5
> dependencies
> 
> - It would be great to get some improvement our web pages; and getting
> some good user documentation together would be really helpful.
> 
> My brain hasn't completely returned from vacation,  so I've probably
> missed out some obvious things,  so please chip in with your opinions,
>  needs and inspirational ideas!
> 
> Kelvin.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to