Thank you..
On 10/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, some answers inline. > > Ashwin Jeksani wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can someone please clear my doubts? > > > > 1. In the bigbank-account demo the Account Component is refering to > > AccountData Component in the same Composite then why do we have two > > composite files(BigBank.composite & AccountData.composite) can some one > > explain me? > > > > AccountData could have been just declared in BigBank.composite, the idea > with this demo was to illustrate that you can nest composites, and then > once you've done that you can make changes to AccountData, grow it from > one small component to a bigger assembly of components without having to > change BigBank.composite. That's all :) > > > 2. If we are referring to a local component and sending the input as a > > String and the response is an Object then do we have to serialize the > > object? > > > > No serialization should be needed to call a local component (the > interface is not marked as @Remote, the component runs in the same node > and no binding is used to call it). > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Ashwini Kumar > > > > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
