On 10/10/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Do we have any potential consumers for this capability?
>
> If so, what are their requirements....
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 10/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 10/10/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> How about making a tuscany-scdl4j jar for this? Something like the
> >>> tuscany-sca-all jar but only containing the modules and classes
> >> necessary
> >>> for processing the scdl and creating model objects? We did talk about
> >>> having
> >>> something like this at one point, is it worth revisiting?
> >>>
> >>>    ...ant
> >>>
> >>> On 10/9/07, Sean Zhou (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> Bootstrapping a subset of Tuscany runtime to support object modeling
> >> in
> >>>> tools
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>                  Key: TUSCANY-1840
> >>>>                  URL:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1840
> >>>>              Project: Tuscany
> >>>>           Issue Type: New Feature
> >>>>           Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> >>>>     Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0.1
> >>>>          Environment: Windows or Linux
> >>>>             Reporter: Sean Zhou
> >>>>             Priority: Critical
> >>>>              Fix For: Java-SCA-1.0.1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> When adopting Tuscany object models in a tooling environment, a
> subset
> >>> of
> >>>> Tuscany runtime requires bootstrap such as creating extension points
> >> and
> >>>> factories. Currently there are no standard API methods or classes for
> >>>> Tuscany bootstrapping for modeling.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >>>> -
> >>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> I think it would. Also it would be useful to take a look at what the
> >> minimum
> >> set of steps (from the ReallySmallRuntime) are required to get a
> >> contribution loaded into the assembly model. Currently we all use
> >> ReallySmallRuntime but it's doing a number of things that are not
> required
> >> to get just the assembly model up.
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >
> > Right i agree, and I guess initially the scdl4j jar could include copies
> of
> > whatever code from ReallySmallRuntime is necessary to load a
> contribution
> > and then later on maybe simplify all the runtime code so it just depends
> on
> > the scdl4j code.
> >
> >    ...ant
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Mike

We have a customer (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1840) but
no specific requirements. I note that this conversation is only on
tuscany-dev so am including tuscany-user in case Sean (who started this off)
can't see it and wants to add more detailed requirements.

Simon

Reply via email to