You're running SDO 1 which is part of EMF 2.2, not Tuscany. My guess is that what you are trying to do should work as long as the static classes are available in the EJB's classLoader scope.
I think you should ask the question on the EMF newsgroup or ask somebody from the IBM WAS team. Frank. Gary R Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/04/2007 01:11:39 PM: > Thanks, > > In this case, I'm using whatever implementation of the SDO 1.0 spec IBM > included in > WebSphere App Server v6.1.0.13 - > ..\plugins\org.eclipse.emf.ecore.sdo_2.2.0.v200609210005.jar > I believe this is almost certainly "pre Tuscany". > > > Would you know if the following behavior is "working as designed"? > > In an EJB client, I can generate "static" SDOs (that inherit from > org.eclipse.emf.ecore.sdo.impl.EDataObjectImpl) > and create an org.eclipse.emf.ecore.sdo.impl.EDataGraphImpl with the > SDOFactory, > and populate its root Object and contained SDOs using > generated IBMFactory, IbmPackage and "static" SDOs. > > I pass that EDataGraph as a parameter to a method defined > on the remote interface of an EJB. After serialization - RMI/IIOP - > deserialization, when > I inspect the EDataGraphImpl in the EJB method, I find that each contained > EDataObjectImpl has > be replaced by a DynamicEDataObjectImpl. > > As a result, I can't (figure out a way to) use > the generated static SDOs in the EJB method. > > Regards, > > Gary > > Senior I/T Architect > Phone (voice, faxmail): 1-513-274-4094 T/364-2632 > Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 11/27/2007 11:58 AM > Please respond to > [email protected] > > > To > [email protected] > cc > > Subject > Re: SDO Java - EDataGraph - serialize-transmit (RMI/IIOP)-deserialize > then access via *static* SDO API? > > > > > > > In a) you should be using commonj.sdo.DataGraph (implementation class > org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DataGraphImpl) because > org.eclipse.emf.ecore.sdo.EDataGraph is a specialized interface in the SDO > > 1 implementation at Eclipse that isn't supported in Tuscany. (if you have > both available, it sounds like you're somehow running both SDO 1 and SDO 2 > > concurrently in your environment.) > > That aside, you should be able to use static classes in the EJB method, as > > long as they've been registered (e.g., StaticFactory.register() was called > > for the EJB scope). > > Frank. > > Gary R Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/27/2007 09:40:34 AM: > > > By design (with any version of SDO and Tuscany Java implementation), > > > > should it be possible to generate "static" SDO classes from an .xsd, and > > > > then: > > > > a) use the generated classes to create an: > > org.eclipse.emf.ecore.sdo.EDataGraph > > b)call a method on the remote interface of an ejb that takes that > > EDataGraph as its only arguement > > c)use the *static* generated SDO classes to access the SDOs in the > > EDataGraph > > > > I've done a) and b) and can use the dynamic SDO API in my EJB method, > > but, I've yet to figure out how (or even if it should be possible by > > design) > > to use the generated "static" SDO classes in my EJB method. > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
