On 3/14/08, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > So you could say that a binding.socket dispatches message processing to a > method called process(message) for example. You are not expecting the > message arriving from the IVR to contain information about which method > should be called. Whenever a message arrives on the the socket, > binding.socket simply dispatches it to the process() method on the service. > The process() method just does whatever processing you need it to do on the > message.
Hi Simon, This is what I exactly need. So IVR won't understand what Java method it should call (although I don't know yet whether IVR can call an RPC method) and on the other side I expect tuscany would listen to any message that arrives and then do the processing. Btw, How reliable is this the message processing? Is the method uses 'handshake' or 'message listener' ? We had bad experience using handshake since the IVR socket is often restarted, and once it is restarted the program all the sudden hangs. I am expecting high reliability from tuscany and won't hang whenever the IVR is restarted. I think message listener is much better than the concept of handshake. Does tuscany provides message listener method? Thanks in advance -- Let's show the world what we've got. Blog: http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
