Hi, I tried to use the fixed version, the messages get processed instantaneously which is great. Thanks for the quick response. But I faced some other problems... The previous version used to work well when I had a reference to the native service.. Now the appropriate native service is called but there is an SDO exception being thrown on the native side when I try to use the SDO object. I have noticed that the xml messages that are exchanged have changed. I am pasting the respective xml messages below...
Before the fix: Input msg: <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Body> <_ns_:methodName xmlns:_ns_="http://scaNativeNamespace"> <p0:sdoArgName xmlns:p0="http://scaNativeNamespace" xmlns:p1="http://scaJavaNamespace"> <p1:attribute1>123</p1:attribute1><p1:attribute2>456</p1:attribute2> </p0:sdoArgName> </_ns_:methodName> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> After the fix(Tuscany-2240): Input msg: <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Body> <_ns_:methodName xmlns:_ns_="http://scaNativeNamespace"> <p0:sdoArgName xmlns:p0="http://scaNativeNamespace" xsi:type="p1:sdoComplexTypeName" xmlns:xsi=" http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:p1="http://scaJavaNamespace "> <p1:attribute1>123</p1:attribute1><p1:attribute2>456</p1:attribute2> </p0:sdoArgName> </_ns_:methodName> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> There is an extra xsi tag that is being added. This problem existed in the 1.0.1 release of SCA and was fixed in the 1.1 version... Is there a way I can work around this problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Altaf -----Original Message----- From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 April 2008 17:20 To: tuscany-dev; Tuscany Users Subject: SDO 1.1.1 RC1 There's now a preview SDO 1.1.1 release available at http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/. The only difference between this and the just released 1.1 release is the fix http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240. I'll leave this a little while before calling a vote to give time for reviews and also would be good if possible to also get a fix for using EMF 2.4 as a user has asked about that. ...ant
