> Is there a way to create an empty function definition with no lines of > code in it? In my coding style I will often do this ( in other languages > ) for RAD just to remind myself that I will need to implement the > function later.
Hi Nick, I agree with the others; using the no-op statement 'pass' is probably the way to go here. If I'm paranoid, I sometimes use a body that just raises a NotImplementedError exception: ###### >>> def functionIHaventWrittenYet(): ... raise NotImplementedError ... >>> functionIHaventWrittenYet() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? File "<stdin>", line 2, in functionIHaventWrittenYet NotImplementedError ###### but, often, just putting in 'pass' stubs is enough. Best of wishes! _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
