Tino Dai schreef:
> How I have it now:
>
> semaA = threading.semaphore()
>
> class nameA:
> def __init__(self):
> <do some stuff>
>
> def run(self):
> <do some stuff>
> semaA.release()
>
> class nameB:
> def __init__(self):
> <do some stuff>
>
> def run(self):
> semaA.acquire()
> <do some stuff>
>
>
> Does that make sense. Or is there a better way?
I think it's better to do something like:
class nameA:
def __init__(self, sema):
self.sema = sema
<other stuff>
def run(self):
<do some stuff>
self.sema.release()
class nameB:
def __init__(self, sema):
self.sema = sema
<other stuff>
def run(self):
self.sema.acquire()
<do some stuff>
Then where you create instances of those classes:
sema = threading.semaphore()
a = nameA(sema)
b = nameB(sema)
Maybe you don't even need the semaphore at all: have a look at
Queue.Queue, it might do exactly what you need.
--
If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood
on the shoulders of giants. -- Isaac Newton
Roel Schroeven
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
