Alan Gauld wrote: > What I was referring to was the lack of any kind of class > structure at all, a purely prototype driven OOP style. > (Somewhat like JavaScript OOP except that it's very easy > to fake classes in JavaScript)
Wikipedia has an article about prototype-based programming: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype-based_programming Among others, it lists JavaScript (and its variations), Lua and Self as prototype-based languages. This paper makes an interesting argument for prototype-based OOP in user-interface programming: http://waltersmith.us/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/OOPSLA95.pdf They say that in UI programming, single-use classes are often created; classes that implement a specific widget or window. In these cases the dichotomy between class and object is not useful, in fact it adds extra cognitive load to the program without providing any benefit. Prototype-based programming is a better fit for this problem domain because instanced with the desired behaviour are created directly. Kent _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
