bhaaluu wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm running Python 2.4 on a GNU/Linux system. > Actually, I was able to get this code to work after only a few > edits that had to do with line wrap, nothing more. Other people are less willing to do this than you are :) It's really the OP's prerogative to make messages posted to the list as easy as possible to be reviewed. And attaching the file rather than posting it inline is an extremely simple improvement and increase in convenience. Perhaps I only speak for myself, but I have a bit of a priority queue in my head, weighted to ease of testing and how much I understand about the topic already, so I'm more likely to help people who 1) post well-formatted code I can run directly, 2) post something I know a decent bit about, or both. -Luke > The code > works fine, and although I don't understand what it is displaying, > the display is rather interesting. On my 1GHz CPU, the 100 point > retriangularization takes 0.29 seconds. The 1000 point retriangulation > takes 4.62 seconds, and the 10000 pointer takes 99.04 seconds. > The display looks like a bad spider web! =) > > Retriangulate! >
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
