On 9/21/07, Jerry Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/21/07, Tino Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a more pythonic way of doing this:
> >
> > if queuePacket.has_key('procSeq') and \
> > queuePacket.has_key('opacSeq') and \
> > queuePacket.has_key('keySeq') and \
> > len(queuePacket['procSeq']) == 0 and \
> > len(queuePacket['opacSeq']) == 0 and \
> > len(queuePacket['keySeq']) == 0:
>
> Assuming we're talking about Python 2.5 or greater I find the
> following pretty readable:
>
> all(queuePacket.has_key(k) for k in ('procSeq', 'opacSeq', 'keySeq')) and
> \
> all(len(queuePacket[k])==0 for k in ('procSeq', 'opacSeq', 'keySeq'))
You can do that in Python?!?!!! That kicks major a......well, this is a
family list. Thanks for that. I really had no idea that you could do that
kind of syntax structure. Now, I have a bunch of code that I can go and make
a lot shorter and more readable
Thanks,
Tino
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
