Alan Gauld wrote:
> "Eric Brunson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
>
>>>>> import timeit
>>>>> t = timeit.Timer( "12 ** .5" )
>>>>> print t.timeit(10000000)
>>>>>
>> 2.29147315025
>>
>>>>> t = timeit.Timer( "sqrt(12)", "from math import sqrt" )
>>>>> print t.timeit(10000000)
>>>>>
>> 7.17679214478
>>
>> Looks like ** is about three times faster than sqrt(), but that
>> could be
>> the function overhead.
>>
>
>
>>>> timeit.Timer("import math; math.sqrt(64)").timeit(1000)
>>>>
> 0.002298138362618829
>
>>>> timeit.Timer("import math; 64 ** 0.5").timeit(1000)
>>>>
> 0.018225722100503106
>
> I get the opposite result by includsing the importt in both
> timing sesions. Looks like it was the import that was slow.
> But that shouldn't affect real world usage sinmce you only
> do it once...
>
Maybe I'm mis-remembering the documentation of timeit. I thought the
second argument to the Timer constructor was "setup code", i.e. code to
be executed once before executing the first argument in the timing loop.
> Alan G.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tutor maillist - [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
>
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
